
That said, the fulfillment of promised retail for a community long underserved is certainly something to note and a welcome sign of progress for neighbors. The CVS is the first step in a line of promised retail on the Georgia Avenue Corridor. The lot in question is at the intersection of Georgia Avenue and New Hampshire Avenue NW, across from Donatelli's Park Place and diagonal from the Georgia Avenue Metro. The space sits just on the border of Wards 1 and 4 and will serve the communities there.
The 11,000 s.f. site is smaller than a typical CVS, which are usually 14,000 to 15,00 s.f. The Georgia Avenue CVS will also include a mezzanine to accommodate more space on a second floor. Construction, not yet begun, is expected to wrap up mid-2010. The project was made possible partly through a $2 million Georgia Avenue Great Streets Grant from the District, which spends approximately one-fifth of its $10 million budget for the area. The grant will be financed through TIF bonds, which make the District a development partner of sorts creating an added value for the lot in order to secure additional private financing. The TIF bond will be financed through the sales tax revenue generated by the new CVS and will expire after 25 years or when the taxes revenue fulfill the financial obligations.
So, the Mayor shoveled some rocks as he lead Councilmembers Graham and Bowser with the cheer of "1-2-3, New CVS!"
Get excited.

7 comments:
Does it bother anyone else that the city is subsidizing the building of a CVS to the tune of $2 million? I know that any development is a welcome sign in this area, but what next, fast food chinese joints asking for government subsidies? If you're going to offer taxpayer dollars there should be a significant benefit to the community...overpriced bandaids and shampoo hardly qualifies.
Two questions: how does this move like lightining but projects in Wards 7 & 8 move at glacial pace and will this same help for quality retail and office be given to East Washington projects, not just 'affordable' housing?
From what I understood at the groundbreaking, the City's $2 million was spend cleaning up the site from the former gas station, and not used to subsidize the CVS.
CMT,
Yes, it does bother me that DC is subsidizing this property (even if it is just cleaning up the property) for a CVS to move in.
The property owners could have done that.
I would feel differently about it if DC was subsidizing a more dense development on this site. But that's not the case here! It's a one-story CVS. Just aweful!
A CVS doesn't need any help, and DC should not have helped a developer seeking to bring in JUST a CVS to a site that is just across the street from a metro station.
DC set the bar pretty low on this deal.
That's too bad that the 10 story residential building was turned down. They could have built that and had the CVS on the ground floor anyway. Plus we would have all those residents right across from the metro station. Now we are only getting a single story building - what a missed opportunity.
While any developer would have loved to put a 10-story building on this site, where do you think they would have to put the parking? Underground is where. And for a contaminated site, that would probably require much more than $2M in soil remediation.
I's pretty sure the 10 story building is mainly BS, was never a serious proposal. It's just being used to justify this low bar project and pretent the project meetings the community benefit requirement for the TIF.
Post a Comment