After several suits and appeals, the District and CASCO eventually entered into a settlement agreement. The District will transfer the Southeast property, valued at $8 million, to the developers and ensure District support of the street closings and necessary zoning changes to allow a development with a 6.0 floor to area ratio density. In exchange for the land and support, the Cohen Companies will release its claim to a leasehold to the Gangplank Marina. The whole process has a ticking clock; if the land exchange, zoning and street closure approvals are not finalized by the June 1, 2010 deadline referenced above, then the Cohen Companies can withdraw from the agreement and could once again pursue a lawsuit against the District over the Southwest property and related punitive damages.
The District Council in March approved the land transfer and density elements. The bill was then signed by the Mayor in April and will receive Congressional review. According to the NCPC staff report, the agreement should be law by May 27, 2010. NCPC will review the matter Thursday and submit its opinion to the Council for consideration, the Council will vote on the street closures bill this month. The street closures bill would exempt the developers from several requirements, such as paying rent on the closed street and from having to provide affordable housing to offset the increase in commercial space.
NCPC's Staff Report finds fault with several elements of the plan, in both the agreement between the District and the developer and with the actual design. NCPC staff notes that the streets in question are part of the original L'Enfant Plan, and therefore owned by the federal government. But NCPC cannot actually administer the necessary bureaucratic smack down to resolve the conflict between District and the feds about the rights to transfer titles. NCPC's Staff Report also notes that the plan for bridges connecting the proposed buildings would block viewsheds (see image at left for the lovely view from the property line). Now, that's a familiar complaint...think streetcars. The staff recommended an approval of the initial design, but suggest the obstructing elements be kindly removed.
The NCPC will take up the issue this Thursday.
Update: To clarify, the NCPC's stance on the viewsheds and vistas within the L'Enfant plan reflect the opinion of the District's own Historic Preservation Review Board (HPRB). In January the HPRB recommended that "any encroachment on L'Enfant views and vistas be completely avoided or minimized to the maximum extent feasible."
Washington, DC real estate development news
4 comments:
You don't know what a viewshed is, do you?
where's the cmte. of 100 on this! i demand that they immediately drop everything and work to halt this abomination! look at those overhead wires. they're within the l'enfant city! for chrissakes, people, this is worse than hitler, tojo, stalin, and charles manson combined!!!
(on to a more serious note—though i would seriously like to see at least a public comment by the overhead wire-phobes on this)
that circle in the picture—could you look this up, because i'm not finding anything on google, and i don't have access to lexis-nexis—but i remember a proposal about 5 years ago or so when it was going to be named "guam circle" or "northern marianas circle" or something like that.
it was to be part of some law introduced by EHN that would add "state street" names (similar to connecticut ave. or rhode island ave.) for each of the US territories. am i the only person who remembers that?
Looking on Google Maps and the rendering, it's hard to tell what streets would need to be closed off. They show Virginia Avenue in the picture, and by the looks of Google Maps they'll need to build it out. Is it 1 block worth of 14th street that looks like it was never built (or disappeared a long time ago)?
This is rather confusing. I walk my dogs down that part of M St regularly and there is no official 14th St and Virginia Avenue doesn't actually run down to M St. This closing of the streets must be some kind of technical designation rather than an actual street closing. Right now it's a beautiful rural road that leads to several boathouses and I really enjoy the walk. Guess I better enjoy it while I can.
Post a Comment
Commercial ads will be deleted, so don't even think about it.