data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d11eb/d11ebc2ae3f38e0f6ac10b925c2d0f93ae52f429" alt=""
Obstacles to adoption of the winning ideas are daunting. The land is administered by the National Park Service (NPS), which would have to support the plan, which would then have to be signed off by Congress, the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) and the U.S. Commission on Fine Arts, none of which have even endorsed the competition. NPS has already devised plans to renovate century old Sylvan Theater, and the Army Corps of Engineers plans to work on a levee system for the northwest corner of the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9bd2/b9bd21e4842e595faf6762b8ebd646ab538f23eb" alt=""
Leaders of the competition, however, are more animated by the debate and thought provocation than by a redesign that would actually stick. Jim Clark, President-elect of the Virginia Society of the AIA and Chair of the steering committee, says the project is "mostly an educational forum, that's why we've opened it to younger students as well." Clark has been leading design competitions for 15 years and sees a larger purpose. "This will generate interesting dialogue about the center of our capital city, and will help educate people about history, about planning, and about the status of the National Mall."
As to the choice of this quadrant of the Mall, Clark answers that "this is really the heart of the National Mall. Symbolically it should be the richest area of the Mall from an interpretive standpoint. The mall has many many needs and will continue to evolve. We're really looking at this competition broadly to assess what role the monument grounds should play in the future." Ellen Goldstein, Executive Director of the steering committee, notes that the intent is not to actually transform the Mall. "We don't have any intent to advocate or lobby for the ideas to be implemented" she says of the winning design, though adding that it "could lead to be a transformational process ultimately, even though it is not a stated objective."
The grounds surrounding the monument have changed little over the years, despite the numerous grandiose ideas by accomplished architects. In the early 20th century a public pool graced the northwest corner of the site, and mid-century government office buildings packed the foot of the monument until they were torn down in 1960. Following the terrorist attacks of September 2001, a circular security perimeter was added to the landscaping, which otherwise looks much like it did when the land was originally reclaimed from the Potomac in the late 1800s.
The steering committee has already selected five of the judges and expects to announce the full panel of judges shortly, whose job it will be to determine what good design will never be built.
Washington DC real estate development news
2 comments:
i've seen so many capitol planning projects, that i believe you're right. it's a recipe for yet another failed idea that will be readdressed in five years. remember the one around 2000 that had new bridges into the city? or the completion of 395 north to connect to 95 instead of dumping everyone off onto ny ave? or completing the se/sw freeway to nowhere? and let's not mention an actual I-95 that doesn't involve going through the city or around a beltway. what concepts!
or the kennedy center 'renovation' with all of its promised changes in traffic paterns..... DC is a hotbed of ideas, but it's premised on a city that finds its virtues in a plethora of immutibilities, due to a variety of arcane rationales (and populist momentum). having said that, we will have the african american museum, and possibly a latino homage to our tireless immigrants from the south. dc is truly reflective of the american appetite. it makes no sense, but if you're a tourist, the food sure tastes good!
Post a Comment
Commercial ads will be deleted, so don't even think about it.