In August, Memphis Holland, a Partner at Holland Development, told DCMud that the group hoped to have a resolution to their negotiations by the end of September. More than four months later, Holland indicates the developers are continuing to meet with the District in order to finalize a contract for the land and determine an appropriate land value. It would seem the District grew tired of underutilized land, opting for a paid parking lot in the meanwhile (not that Mount Vernon really needs more of those).
The ANC had resoundingly supported the development during the RFP process, but the protracted negotiations and new surface parking lot have set some neighbors on edge. ANC Commissioner Keith Silver is protesting the DMPED's parking lot decision and the District's alleged exclusion of the community from conversations with the developers about the proposed development.
According to Holland the developers had "absolutely nothing to do with the final decision by the District to have a parking lot as the temporary use for the site," but "we have been told this will not impede our objectives to develop the site, as planned, for a mixed-use development." Holland added that the group is continuing to work with project partners including Sol Melia and Boisdale as well as the neighborhood retail mix including Zenith Gallery.
That said, the parking lot decision shows a lack of faith by the District government for the near future of construction and development at 5th and I Streets in Mount Vernon.
Washington DC real estate development news
5 comments:
God, a parking lot?!?!?! Really? leave it an empty lot. The last thing that area needs is a parking lot. DC needs to get out of the parking industry (ie DCUSA debacle). I can't think of a better way to kill and up and coming neighborhood and future development than by building a parking lot.
The city spent $8-10 million on the parking lot at the old Convention Center site. Even though it has been operated years longer then initially thought possible it has been a financial failure. With the way the city develops a parking lots doing so at this site garantees that it will just suck up tax dollars with no hope of any return. Leave the lot as is.
Regardless of economic opportunity - which sound non-existent with this plan anyways - a parking lot 'feels' like a step backwards. Not worth it, as this will slow the momentum of the project. No more surface parking lots close in downtown neighborhoods!!!
I would rather see DC turn this into a playground or park!
This goes against the 'Green" intiative that the City has promoted. More vehicles? This area already has 1,000's of parking spaces that are not maximized. Who is paying for all of this infastructure, i.e., storm water management, lighting, fencing, booth, electric, asphalt. Or can they build with adhearing to code?
Post a Comment
Commercial ads will be deleted, so don't even think about it.